Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sumit Nagal vs Gavin Van Peperzeel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nagal vs Peperzeel analysis and find out who is favored!
Sumit Nagal vs Gavin Van Peperzeel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nagal 1 - 1 Peperzeel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nagal has won 54.79% of points on their second serve, while Peperzeel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nagal, in recent form, has won 54.26% of their opponent's second serve points, while Peperzeel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.3% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nagal has saved 64.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peperzeel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nagal has won 61.11% of matches played (W/L 44/ 28), with Peperzeel winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 219/ 127), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Peperzeel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 114/ 68), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.35% of matches (W/L 33/ 16), where as Peperzeel has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nagal winning 1 times and Peperzeel being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Nagal winning 2 and Peperzeel winning 2. The last match between Nagal and Peperzeel was at the Australia F10, 17-11-2016, Quarterfinals, Hard with Sumit Nagal getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:35:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nagal and Peperzeel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nagal winning 0 times and Peperzeel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nagal winning 0, and Peperzeel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nagal has played against opponents with an average rank of 254.83 while Peperzeel has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nagal has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peperzeel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nagal has converted 45.83% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peperzeel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
77
Rank
77
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
251
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
61% (322-207)
Career Total W/L
58% (230-164)
64% (23-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$434,190
Career Prize Money
$720
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sumit Nagal | Gavin Van Peperzeel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 20 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:35:30 | 0:35:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (32/44) | 59% (37/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (22/32) | 65% (24/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 92% (11/12) | 42% (11/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (28/63) | 25% (11/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Sumit Nagal
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
0
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 6-3 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sumit Nagal | Gavin Van Peperzeel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (23/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (54/33) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (449/374) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (14/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 63 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 51 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:11 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 226 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (1869/2663) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1245/1869) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (435/794) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (121/264) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1066/2630) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 78% (14/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (22/33) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 45% (5/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (26/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (26/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Alexander Ritschard
72%
(
77 of
107)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
107
Total Points Won
90
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Luca Van Assche
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Ivan Gakhov
84%
(
47 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
43%
(
30 of
70)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
73%
(
64 of
88)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
107
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Sumit Nagal
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gavin Van Peperzeel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Look
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
70%
(
68 of
97)
1st Serve %
69%
(
65 of
94)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
33 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayne Kelly
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
59%
(
67 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
5
Aces
10
8
Double Faults
5
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
46 of
63)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
46 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gavin Van Peperzeel
Player
Edward Bourchier
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Vuradin
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
58%
(
65 of
113)
1st Serve %
66%
(
73 of
111)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
53 of
73)
63%
(
30 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
33 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Renta Tokuda
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luke Saville
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gavin Van Peperzeel
Player
Renta Tokuda
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
5
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Gavin Van Peperzeel
Player
Ken Onishi
68%
(
71 of
104)
1st Serve %
77%
(
95 of
123)
14
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
59 of
95)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
123)
117
Total Points Won
110
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Harris
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-7(7) 7-6(4) 7-6(5) 1-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Nagal Vs Peperzeel Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Nagal are available here and Peperzeel photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Sumit Nagal
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
